template{display:none;}.mag-rich-xref-fn { cursor: pointer;}//长视频$(document).ready(function(){if($("#showLongArticleVideo") && $("#showLongArticleVideo").length && $("#showLongArticleVideo").length>0){mag_ajax_update({ele_id:'showLongArticleVideo',url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + "/CN/article/showLongArticleVideo.do?id="+$("#articleId").val()});}});$(document).ready(function(){window.metaData = {"journal":{"issn":"1000-5072","qiKanMingCheng_CN":"暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)","id":2,"qiKanMingCheng_EN":"Jinan Journal"},"fundList_cn":["国家社会科学基金重点项目“民法典实质债法规范体系研究”(22AFX015)。"],"article":{"keywordList_cn":["合同订立中的第三人责任","第三人缔约过失责任","第三人欺诈和胁迫","《民法典》第500条","《民法典》第157条"],"juan":"47","zhaiyao_cn":"第三人介入他人缔约致损且具有归责基础时,通常可配置侵权责任或缔约过失责任。《民法典》合同编司法解释第5条主旨为“合同订立中的第三人责任”,颇具中国特色。其目的是确定第三人欺诈和胁迫时的责任承担,其性质均为侵害人身自由的侵权责任。该条并未纳入因第三人过错促成合同成立的行为,尤其是第三人过失提供不当信息的行为。我国法有必要建构完整的第三人介入合同行为的责任规则,还应规定第三人因过失促成合同订立导致缔约一方受损时的责任承担。这主要见于第三人赋予缔约方特别的、高度的、可期待的信赖之情形,包括信赖第三人的品行、经济实力、专业和经验等。第三人因过失提供不实信息促成合同成立的,在符合严格的责任成立要件时,应承担相应责任。我国第三人缔约过失责任应做两方面的理论革新。一是着眼于受害人的意思形成自由而非其经济损失,第三人不当介入他人缔约的行为均剥夺或干扰了绝对权,理论上可用侵权责任统一缔约中的第三人责任。二是改变既有的基于责任的结果思维,而着眼于行为导向,第三人缔约过失行为同时发生合同法和侵权责任法上的效力,应兼用侵权责任和缔约过失责任。","endNoteUrl_en":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/EN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=EndNote&id=7156","reference":"","bibtexUrl_cn":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/CN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=BibTeX&id=7156","abstractUrl_en":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/EN/10.11778/j.jnxb.20241278","qi":"1","id":7156,"nian":2025,"bianHao":"1742196815916-888696877","zuoZheEn_L":"XIE Hongfei","juanUrl_en":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/EN/Y2025","shouCiFaBuRiQi":"2025-03-17","qiShiYe":"77","qiUrl_cn":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/CN/Y2025/V47/I1","lanMu_cn":"法学·民法典实施","pdfSize":"748","zuoZhe_CN":"谢鸿飞","risUrl_cn":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/CN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=Ris&id=7156","title_cn":"缔约中第三人责任的类型及其整合","doi":"10.11778/j.jnxb.20241278","jieShuYe":"96","keywordList_en":["Third-party liability in contract formation","Third-party liability for negligent contracting","Third-party fraud and duress","Article 500 of the Civil Code","Article 157 of the Civil Code"],"endNoteUrl_cn":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/CN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=EndNote&id=7156","zhaiyao_en":"When a third party's intervention in the contractual negotiation process causes damage to others and meets the criteria for imputation, such liability may generally be attributed to either tort liability or culpa in contrahendo (pre-contractual liability). Article 5 of the Judicial Interpretation of the Contract Section of the Civil Code, titled “Third-Party Liability in Contract Formation”, embodies distinct Chinese characteristics. Its purpose is to determine liability for third-party fraud or coercion, both of which constitute tortious acts infringing on personal freedom. This can be justified through two approaches: the third party's infringement of the victim's absolute rights, or intentional violations of others' rights and interests through methods contrary to public morals. A third party's undue influence on contractual negotiations may qualify as a tort. Consequently, even if the victim fails to rescind the contract within the prescriptive period, they may still seek compensation by claiming tort liability against the third party. However, the provision does not address scenarios where a third party negligently facilitates contract formation, particularly through the provision of false information. Chinese laws should establish a comprehensive framework for third-party liability in contractual negotiations, including liability for negligent acts by third parties that lead to damages for one party during contract formation. This applies primarily in cases where the contracting party places special, highly, and justifiable reliance on the third party, such as trust in the third party's integrity, financial capacity, professional expertise, or experience. If a third party negligently provides false information that induces contract formation, and such conduct satisfies the elements of culpa in contrahendo-specifically, if it generates reasonable reliance by the contracting party, materially influences their decision-making, and lacks exculpatory clauses-the third party should bear liability. Theoretically, deriving economic benefit should not be a prerequisite for imposing culpa in contrahendo on a third party, though it may inform the assessment of whether reliance was reasonable. In cases involving gratuitous provision of information, if the third party acted without intent or gross negligence, liability mitigation rules akin to those for “goodwill ride-sharing” may apply by analogy. The existing approach of unifying third-party liability under culpa in contrahendo faces theoretical challenges. Some acts of pre-contractual misconduct that constitute torts could be governed by tort law, while third-party coercion, where no reliance relationship exists, cannot be adequately addressed. Sole reliance on contract and tort mechanisms fails to resolve the complexities of pre-contractual liability. Theoretical innovations are thus needed in two respects: (1) Shifting focus from economic loss to the victim's freedom of volitional formation. Third-party interference in contractual negotiations inherently infringes on absolute rights, albeit with varying degrees of harm. Article 1165 of the Civil Code, which protects “civil rights and interests of others”, should encompass interests beyond absolute rights (e.g., economic interests). This would theoretically allow tort liability to unify third-party liability in contractual contexts. However, this approach must address unresolved questions, such as why victims cannot rescind contracts when third-party negligence facilitates formation, and how to incorporate scenarios involving invalid contracts or mutual material misunderstandings. Second, replacing result-oriented liability frameworks with conduct-oriented analysis. Instead of constructing a unified doctrine of culpa in contrahendo, liability should be determined based on the nature of specific acts and case-specific circumstances, invoking either contract law or tort law as appropriate. By combining the legal effects of both regimes, including compensation for mental distress and expectation interests, the debate over the independence of culpa in contrahendo could be circumvented, ensuring fairer outcomes. This dual approach will harmonize doctrinal coherence with practical flexibility, addressing gaps in current law while advancing a more equitable framework for third-party liability in contractual negotiations.","bibtexUrl_en":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/EN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=BibTeX&id=7156","abstractUrl_cn":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/CN/10.11778/j.jnxb.20241278","zuoZheCn_L":"谢鸿飞","juanUrl_cn":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/CN/Y2025","lanMu_en":"","qiUrl_en":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/EN/Y2025/V47/I1","zuoZhe_EN":"XIE Hongfei","risUrl_en":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/EN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=Ris&id=7156","title_en":"Types of Third-Party Liability in Contract Formation and Integration","hasPdf":"true"},"authorNotes_cn":["谢鸿飞,中国社会科学院法学研究所。"]};if(window.metaData && (!window.metaData.authorNotesCommon_cn && !window.metaData.authorNotesCorresp_cn && window.metaData.authorNotes_cn)){window.metaData.authorNotesCommon_cn = window.metaData.authorNotes_cn;}if(window.metaData && (!window.metaData.authorNotesCommon_en && !window.metaData.authorNotesCorresp_en && window.metaData.authorNotes_en)){window.metaData.authorNotesCommon_en = window.metaData.authorNotes_en;}var _nlmdtdXml = $("#article_nlmdtdXml").val();var magDir = _nlmdtdXml.replace(/\/[^\/]+$/,'');window.metaData.magDir = magDir;new mag_vue({ el: '#metaVue', //dataUrl: mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/EN/article/getRichHtmlJson.do?articleId='+$("#articleId").val(), data:window.metaData, loading:true, doTextFun:function(text){ return doDataJsonText(text); }, doAfterFun:function(selector,jsonData){doMagVueAfter(selector,jsonData);}});var pars = {attachType:'PDF',id:$("#articleId").val(),json:true};jQuery.post($("#mag-common-contextPath").val()+"/CN/article/showArticleFile.do?" + new Date().getTime(), pars, function(data){var json=null;if(data.match(/^\[json\].*/g)){json=eval("("+data.replace(/^\[json\]/g,"")+")");}if(json && json.status == 1){//有权限}else{//无权限$("#no-access-div").show();}});mag_ajax({url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/article/getRichHtmlJson.do',data:{articleId:$("#articleId").val(),token:'be8a2a7330544e98942d2b2293c3809d',referer:document.referrer},dataType:"json",async:"false",success:function(json){if(json.richHtmlJson && json.richHtmlJson.article){if(json.trans){var _nlmdtdXmlCN = $("#article_nlmdtdXmlCN").val();var magDirCN = _nlmdtdXmlCN.replace(/\/[^\/]+$/,'');json.richHtmlJson.magDir=magDirCN;}else{json.richHtmlJson.magDir=magDir;}new mag_vue({ el: '#bodyVue', data:json.richHtmlJson, doTextFun:function(text){ return doDataJsonText(text); }, doAfterFun:function(selector,jsonData){doMagVueAfter(selector,jsonData);}});}}});//altmetricif($.trim($("#article_doi").val())!=''){$.ajax({url:'https://api.altmetric.com/v1/doi/'+$.trim($("#article_doi").val())+'?callback=altmetric_callback',//url:'https://api.altmetric.com/v1/doi/10.1007/s13238-016-0264-7?callback=altmetric_callback',dataType:'jsonp'});}mag_rich_menu(jQuery);$(function(){ $('#autoMenu').autoMenu();})$("#autoMenu").niceScroll({cursorcolor: "#ccc", //滚动条的颜色cursoropacitymax: 0, //滚动条的透明度,从0-1 touchbehavior: false, //使光标拖动滚动像在台式电脑触摸设备 true滚动条拖动不可用 cursorwidth: "6px", //滚动条的宽度 单位默认px cursorborder: "0", // 游标边框css定义 cursorborderradius: "3px", //滚动条两头的圆角 autohidemode: true, //是否隐藏滚动条 true的时候默认不显示滚动条,当鼠标经过的时候显示滚动条 zindex: "auto", //给滚动条设置z-index值 railvalign:'defaul',railpadding: {top: 0,right: -6,left: 0,bottom: 0}, //滚动条的位置});window.autoMenuFlag=true;$("#relatedArticles").niceScroll({cursorcolor: "#ccc", //滚动条的颜色cursoropacitymax: 0, //滚动条的透明度,从0-1 touchbehavior: false, //使光标拖动滚动像在台式电脑触摸设备 true滚动条拖动不可用 cursorwidth: "6px", //滚动条的宽度 单位默认px cursorborder: "0", // 游标边框css定义 cursorborderradius: "3px", //滚动条两头的圆角 autohidemode: true, //是否隐藏滚动条 true的时候默认不显示滚动条,当鼠标经过的时候显示滚动条 zindex: "auto", //给滚动条设置z-index值 railvalign:'defaul',railpadding: {top: 0,right: -6,left: 0,bottom: 0}, //滚动条的位置});//公式序号 居右jQuery(".mag-xml-disp-formula").each(function() {var _this = jQuery(this);var _label= _this.children("label");if(typeof(_label.html())!="undefined"){_this.children("label").remove();_this.wrap("");_this.parent().parent().append(""+_label.html()+"");}});$('body').click(function(){$('.daochu_div').hide();$('.qipao').hide();})$('.qipao').click(function(event){event.stopPropagation();})/*参考文献显示隐藏*/$('.biaotijiantoush1').click(function(event){if($(this).attr('class')=='glyphicon glyphicon-triangle-top biaotijiantoush biaotijiantoush1'){$(this).parents('.mag_main_zhengwen_left_div_ckwx_table_benwenyiny').next('.mag_main_zhengwen_left_div_ckwx_table_ckwx_xiangqing').stop().slideUp();$(this).attr('class','glyphicon glyphicon-triangle-bottom biaotijiantoush biaotijiantoush1');}else if($(this).attr('class')=='glyphicon glyphicon-triangle-bottom biaotijiantoush biaotijiantoush1'){$(this).parents('.mag_main_zhengwen_left_div_ckwx_table_benwenyiny').next('.mag_main_zhengwen_left_div_ckwx_table_ckwx_xiangqing').stop().slideDown();$(this).attr('class','glyphicon glyphicon-triangle-top biaotijiantoush biaotijiantoush1');}event.stopPropagation();});//加载补充材料mag_ajax_update({ele_id:'showArticle_suppls',url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/article/showArticleSuppls.do',data:{articleId:$("#articleId").val()}});//加载专题mag_ajax_update({ele_id:'showArticle_subjects',url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/subject/showSubjectListByArticle.do',data:{articleId:$("#articleId").val(),forwardJsp:'showArticle'}});//渲染公式mag_mathJax();});function altmetric_callback(json){if(json && json.score){if(json.score - parseInt(json.score) > 0){$("#altmetric-score").html(parseInt(json.score)+1);}else{$("#altmetric-score").html(parseInt(json.score));}$(".main_content_center_right_duoweidu_div").css("width","25%");$("#altmetric-a").show();$("#altmetric-a").attr("href",json.details_url);}}function richClickAuthor(name){var searchSQL = "((("+mag_advSearchValReplace(name)+"[Author]) AND 2J[Journal]) AND year[Order])";mag_request({url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/searchresult',data:{searchSQL:searchSQL}});}function richClickKeyword(keyword){var searchSQL = "((("+mag_advSearchValReplace(keyword)+"[Keyword]) AND 2J[Journal]) AND year[Order])";mag_request({url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/searchresult',data:{searchSQL:searchSQL}});}function mag_share(){$("#bShare_more_a").click();}function loadRelatedArticles(){if($("#showRelatedArticles") && $("#showRelatedArticles").length>0){//加载过了}else{mag_loading();mag_ajax_update({ele_id:'relatedArticles-content',url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/article/relatedArticle.do',data:{id:$("#articleId").val(), forwardJsp:'showArticle'},complete:function(){mag_layer_close();}});}}function showMetrics(){mag_window_location(mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/metrics/'+$("#articleId").val());}function piaofuFn(a,fnId){var content=''+$("#mag-rich-fn-"+fnId).html()+'';piaofu(a,content);}function huoqukuanduimg(){//}function doDataJsonText(text){var str = text;//var _nlmdtdXml = $("#article_nlmdtdXml").val();//var magDir = _nlmdtdXml.replace(/\/[^\/]+$/,'');str = str.replace(/";ss += "";var shuomingTitle = "";var shuomingContent = '';if(fig.titleCn && fig.titleCn!=''){shuomingTitle = fig.titleCn;if(fig.titleContentCn && fig.titleContentCn!=''){shuomingContent += fig.titleContentCn;}}if(shuomingTitle==''){if(fig.titleEn && fig.titleEn!=''){shuomingTitle = fig.titleEn;}if(fig.titleContentEn && fig.titleContentEn!=''){shuomingContent += fig.titleContentEn;}}else{if(fig.titleEn && fig.titleEn!=''){shuomingContent += ""+fig.titleEn+"">

暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)

北大核心,CSSCI,AMI核心

国内刊号:44-1285/C

国际刊号:1000-5072

暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)杂志2025年第1期:缔约中第三人责任的类型及其整合

发布日期:

作者:谢鸿飞

单位:中国社会科学院法学研究所。

关键词:合同订立中的第三人责任,第三人缔约过失责任,第三人欺诈和胁迫,《民法典》第500条,《民法典》第157条

基金:国家社会科学基金重点项目“民法典实质债法规范体系研究”(22AFX015)。

第三人介入他人缔约致损且具有归责基础时,通常可配置侵权责任或缔约过失责任。《民法典》合同编司法解释第5条主旨为“合同订立中的第三人责任”,颇具中国特色。其目的是确定第三人欺诈和胁迫时的责任承担,其性质均为侵害人身自由的侵权责任。该条并未纳入因第三人过错促成合同成立的行为,尤其是第三人过失提供不当信息的行为。我国法有必要建构完整的第三人介入合同行为的责任规则,还应规定第三人因过失促成合同订立导致缔约一方受损时的责任承担。这主要见于第三人赋予缔约方特别的、高度的、可期待的信赖之情形,包括信赖第三人的品行、经济实力、专业和经验等。第三人因过失提供不实信息促成合同成立的,在符合严格的责任成立要件时,应承担相应责任。我国第三人缔约过失责任应做两方面的理论革新。一是着眼于受害人的意思形成自由而非其经济损失,第三人不当介入他人缔约的行为均剥夺或干扰了绝对权,理论上可用侵权责任统一缔约中的第三人责任。二是改变既有的基于责任的结果思维,而着眼于行为导向,第三人缔约过失行为同时发生合同法和侵权责任法上的效力,应兼用侵权责任和缔约过失责任。"/>template{display:none;}.mag-rich-xref-fn { cursor: pointer;}//长视频$(document).ready(function(){if($("#showLongArticleVideo") && $("#showLongArticleVideo").length && $("#showLongArticleVideo").length>0){mag_ajax_update({ele_id:'showLongArticleVideo',url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + "/CN/article/showLongArticleVideo.do?id="+$("#articleId").val()});}});$(document).ready(function(){window.metaData = {"journal":{"issn":"1000-5072","qiKanMingCheng_CN":"暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)","id":2,"qiKanMingCheng_EN":"Jinan Journal"},"fundList_cn":["国家社会科学基金重点项目“民法典实质债法规范体系研究”(22AFX015)。"],"article":{"keywordList_cn":["合同订立中的第三人责任","第三人缔约过失责任","第三人欺诈和胁迫","《民法典》第500条","《民法典》第157条"],"juan":"47","zhaiyao_cn":"第三人介入他人缔约致损且具有归责基础时,通常可配置侵权责任或缔约过失责任。《民法典》合同编司法解释第5条主旨为“合同订立中的第三人责任”,颇具中国特色。其目的是确定第三人欺诈和胁迫时的责任承担,其性质均为侵害人身自由的侵权责任。该条并未纳入因第三人过错促成合同成立的行为,尤其是第三人过失提供不当信息的行为。我国法有必要建构完整的第三人介入合同行为的责任规则,还应规定第三人因过失促成合同订立导致缔约一方受损时的责任承担。这主要见于第三人赋予缔约方特别的、高度的、可期待的信赖之情形,包括信赖第三人的品行、经济实力、专业和经验等。第三人因过失提供不实信息促成合同成立的,在符合严格的责任成立要件时,应承担相应责任。我国第三人缔约过失责任应做两方面的理论革新。一是着眼于受害人的意思形成自由而非其经济损失,第三人不当介入他人缔约的行为均剥夺或干扰了绝对权,理论上可用侵权责任统一缔约中的第三人责任。二是改变既有的基于责任的结果思维,而着眼于行为导向,第三人缔约过失行为同时发生合同法和侵权责任法上的效力,应兼用侵权责任和缔约过失责任。","endNoteUrl_en":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/EN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=EndNote&id=7156","reference":"","bibtexUrl_cn":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/CN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=BibTeX&id=7156","abstractUrl_en":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/EN/10.11778/j.jnxb.20241278","qi":"1","id":7156,"nian":2025,"bianHao":"1742196815916-888696877","zuoZheEn_L":"XIE Hongfei","juanUrl_en":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/EN/Y2025","shouCiFaBuRiQi":"2025-03-17","qiShiYe":"77","qiUrl_cn":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/CN/Y2025/V47/I1","lanMu_cn":"法学·民法典实施","pdfSize":"748","zuoZhe_CN":"谢鸿飞","risUrl_cn":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/CN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=Ris&id=7156","title_cn":"缔约中第三人责任的类型及其整合","doi":"10.11778/j.jnxb.20241278","jieShuYe":"96","keywordList_en":["Third-party liability in contract formation","Third-party liability for negligent contracting","Third-party fraud and duress","Article 500 of the Civil Code","Article 157 of the Civil Code"],"endNoteUrl_cn":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/CN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=EndNote&id=7156","zhaiyao_en":"When a third party's intervention in the contractual negotiation process causes damage to others and meets the criteria for imputation, such liability may generally be attributed to either tort liability or culpa in contrahendo (pre-contractual liability). Article 5 of the Judicial Interpretation of the Contract Section of the Civil Code, titled “Third-Party Liability in Contract Formation”, embodies distinct Chinese characteristics. Its purpose is to determine liability for third-party fraud or coercion, both of which constitute tortious acts infringing on personal freedom. This can be justified through two approaches: the third party's infringement of the victim's absolute rights, or intentional violations of others' rights and interests through methods contrary to public morals. A third party's undue influence on contractual negotiations may qualify as a tort. Consequently, even if the victim fails to rescind the contract within the prescriptive period, they may still seek compensation by claiming tort liability against the third party. However, the provision does not address scenarios where a third party negligently facilitates contract formation, particularly through the provision of false information. Chinese laws should establish a comprehensive framework for third-party liability in contractual negotiations, including liability for negligent acts by third parties that lead to damages for one party during contract formation. This applies primarily in cases where the contracting party places special, highly, and justifiable reliance on the third party, such as trust in the third party's integrity, financial capacity, professional expertise, or experience. If a third party negligently provides false information that induces contract formation, and such conduct satisfies the elements of culpa in contrahendo-specifically, if it generates reasonable reliance by the contracting party, materially influences their decision-making, and lacks exculpatory clauses-the third party should bear liability. Theoretically, deriving economic benefit should not be a prerequisite for imposing culpa in contrahendo on a third party, though it may inform the assessment of whether reliance was reasonable. In cases involving gratuitous provision of information, if the third party acted without intent or gross negligence, liability mitigation rules akin to those for “goodwill ride-sharing” may apply by analogy. The existing approach of unifying third-party liability under culpa in contrahendo faces theoretical challenges. Some acts of pre-contractual misconduct that constitute torts could be governed by tort law, while third-party coercion, where no reliance relationship exists, cannot be adequately addressed. Sole reliance on contract and tort mechanisms fails to resolve the complexities of pre-contractual liability. Theoretical innovations are thus needed in two respects: (1) Shifting focus from economic loss to the victim's freedom of volitional formation. Third-party interference in contractual negotiations inherently infringes on absolute rights, albeit with varying degrees of harm. Article 1165 of the Civil Code, which protects “civil rights and interests of others”, should encompass interests beyond absolute rights (e.g., economic interests). This would theoretically allow tort liability to unify third-party liability in contractual contexts. However, this approach must address unresolved questions, such as why victims cannot rescind contracts when third-party negligence facilitates formation, and how to incorporate scenarios involving invalid contracts or mutual material misunderstandings. Second, replacing result-oriented liability frameworks with conduct-oriented analysis. Instead of constructing a unified doctrine of culpa in contrahendo, liability should be determined based on the nature of specific acts and case-specific circumstances, invoking either contract law or tort law as appropriate. By combining the legal effects of both regimes, including compensation for mental distress and expectation interests, the debate over the independence of culpa in contrahendo could be circumvented, ensuring fairer outcomes. This dual approach will harmonize doctrinal coherence with practical flexibility, addressing gaps in current law while advancing a more equitable framework for third-party liability in contractual negotiations.","bibtexUrl_en":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/EN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=BibTeX&id=7156","abstractUrl_cn":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/CN/10.11778/j.jnxb.20241278","zuoZheCn_L":"谢鸿飞","juanUrl_cn":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/CN/Y2025","lanMu_en":"","qiUrl_en":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/EN/Y2025/V47/I1","zuoZhe_EN":"XIE Hongfei","risUrl_en":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/EN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=Ris&id=7156","title_en":"Types of Third-Party Liability in Contract Formation and Integration","hasPdf":"true"},"authorNotes_cn":["谢鸿飞,中国社会科学院法学研究所。"]};if(window.metaData && (!window.metaData.authorNotesCommon_cn && !window.metaData.authorNotesCorresp_cn && window.metaData.authorNotes_cn)){window.metaData.authorNotesCommon_cn = window.metaData.authorNotes_cn;}if(window.metaData && (!window.metaData.authorNotesCommon_en && !window.metaData.authorNotesCorresp_en && window.metaData.authorNotes_en)){window.metaData.authorNotesCommon_en = window.metaData.authorNotes_en;}var _nlmdtdXml = $("#article_nlmdtdXml").val();var magDir = _nlmdtdXml.replace(/\/[^\/]+$/,'');window.metaData.magDir = magDir;new mag_vue({ el: '#metaVue', //dataUrl: mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/EN/article/getRichHtmlJson.do?articleId='+$("#articleId").val(), data:window.metaData, loading:true, doTextFun:function(text){ return doDataJsonText(text); }, doAfterFun:function(selector,jsonData){doMagVueAfter(selector,jsonData);}});var pars = {attachType:'PDF',id:$("#articleId").val(),json:true};jQuery.post($("#mag-common-contextPath").val()+"/CN/article/showArticleFile.do?" + new Date().getTime(), pars, function(data){var json=null;if(data.match(/^\[json\].*/g)){json=eval("("+data.replace(/^\[json\]/g,"")+")");}if(json && json.status == 1){//有权限}else{//无权限$("#no-access-div").show();}});mag_ajax({url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/article/getRichHtmlJson.do',data:{articleId:$("#articleId").val(),token:'be8a2a7330544e98942d2b2293c3809d',referer:document.referrer},dataType:"json",async:"false",success:function(json){if(json.richHtmlJson && json.richHtmlJson.article){if(json.trans){var _nlmdtdXmlCN = $("#article_nlmdtdXmlCN").val();var magDirCN = _nlmdtdXmlCN.replace(/\/[^\/]+$/,'');json.richHtmlJson.magDir=magDirCN;}else{json.richHtmlJson.magDir=magDir;}new mag_vue({ el: '#bodyVue', data:json.richHtmlJson, doTextFun:function(text){ return doDataJsonText(text); }, doAfterFun:function(selector,jsonData){doMagVueAfter(selector,jsonData);}});}}});//altmetricif($.trim($("#article_doi").val())!=''){$.ajax({url:'https://api.altmetric.com/v1/doi/'+$.trim($("#article_doi").val())+'?callback=altmetric_callback',//url:'https://api.altmetric.com/v1/doi/10.1007/s13238-016-0264-7?callback=altmetric_callback',dataType:'jsonp'});}mag_rich_menu(jQuery);$(function(){ $('#autoMenu').autoMenu();})$("#autoMenu").niceScroll({cursorcolor: "#ccc", //滚动条的颜色cursoropacitymax: 0, //滚动条的透明度,从0-1 touchbehavior: false, //使光标拖动滚动像在台式电脑触摸设备 true滚动条拖动不可用 cursorwidth: "6px", //滚动条的宽度 单位默认px cursorborder: "0", // 游标边框css定义 cursorborderradius: "3px", //滚动条两头的圆角 autohidemode: true, //是否隐藏滚动条 true的时候默认不显示滚动条,当鼠标经过的时候显示滚动条 zindex: "auto", //给滚动条设置z-index值 railvalign:'defaul',railpadding: {top: 0,right: -6,left: 0,bottom: 0}, //滚动条的位置});window.autoMenuFlag=true;$("#relatedArticles").niceScroll({cursorcolor: "#ccc", //滚动条的颜色cursoropacitymax: 0, //滚动条的透明度,从0-1 touchbehavior: false, //使光标拖动滚动像在台式电脑触摸设备 true滚动条拖动不可用 cursorwidth: "6px", //滚动条的宽度 单位默认px cursorborder: "0", // 游标边框css定义 cursorborderradius: "3px", //滚动条两头的圆角 autohidemode: true, //是否隐藏滚动条 true的时候默认不显示滚动条,当鼠标经过的时候显示滚动条 zindex: "auto", //给滚动条设置z-index值 railvalign:'defaul',railpadding: {top: 0,right: -6,left: 0,bottom: 0}, //滚动条的位置});//公式序号 居右jQuery(".mag-xml-disp-formula").each(function() {var _this = jQuery(this);var _label= _this.children("label");if(typeof(_label.html())!="undefined"){_this.children("label").remove();_this.wrap("");_this.parent().parent().append(""+_label.html()+"");}});$('body').click(function(){$('.daochu_div').hide();$('.qipao').hide();})$('.qipao').click(function(event){event.stopPropagation();})/*参考文献显示隐藏*/$('.biaotijiantoush1').click(function(event){if($(this).attr('class')=='glyphicon glyphicon-triangle-top biaotijiantoush biaotijiantoush1'){$(this).parents('.mag_main_zhengwen_left_div_ckwx_table_benwenyiny').next('.mag_main_zhengwen_left_div_ckwx_table_ckwx_xiangqing').stop().slideUp();$(this).attr('class','glyphicon glyphicon-triangle-bottom biaotijiantoush biaotijiantoush1');}else if($(this).attr('class')=='glyphicon glyphicon-triangle-bottom biaotijiantoush biaotijiantoush1'){$(this).parents('.mag_main_zhengwen_left_div_ckwx_table_benwenyiny').next('.mag_main_zhengwen_left_div_ckwx_table_ckwx_xiangqing').stop().slideDown();$(this).attr('class','glyphicon glyphicon-triangle-top biaotijiantoush biaotijiantoush1');}event.stopPropagation();});//加载补充材料mag_ajax_update({ele_id:'showArticle_suppls',url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/article/showArticleSuppls.do',data:{articleId:$("#articleId").val()}});//加载专题mag_ajax_update({ele_id:'showArticle_subjects',url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/subject/showSubjectListByArticle.do',data:{articleId:$("#articleId").val(),forwardJsp:'showArticle'}});//渲染公式mag_mathJax();});function altmetric_callback(json){if(json && json.score){if(json.score - parseInt(json.score) > 0){$("#altmetric-score").html(parseInt(json.score)+1);}else{$("#altmetric-score").html(parseInt(json.score));}$(".main_content_center_right_duoweidu_div").css("width","25%");$("#altmetric-a").show();$("#altmetric-a").attr("href",json.details_url);}}function richClickAuthor(name){var searchSQL = "((("+mag_advSearchValReplace(name)+"[Author]) AND 2J[Journal]) AND year[Order])";mag_request({url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/searchresult',data:{searchSQL:searchSQL}});}function richClickKeyword(keyword){var searchSQL = "((("+mag_advSearchValReplace(keyword)+"[Keyword]) AND 2J[Journal]) AND year[Order])";mag_request({url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/searchresult',data:{searchSQL:searchSQL}});}function mag_share(){$("#bShare_more_a").click();}function loadRelatedArticles(){if($("#showRelatedArticles") && $("#showRelatedArticles").length>0){//加载过了}else{mag_loading();mag_ajax_update({ele_id:'relatedArticles-content',url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/article/relatedArticle.do',data:{id:$("#articleId").val(), forwardJsp:'showArticle'},complete:function(){mag_layer_close();}});}}function showMetrics(){mag_window_location(mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/metrics/'+$("#articleId").val());}function piaofuFn(a,fnId){var content=''+$("#mag-rich-fn-"+fnId).html()+'';piaofu(a,content);}function huoqukuanduimg(){//}function doDataJsonText(text){var str = text;//var _nlmdtdXml = $("#article_nlmdtdXml").val();//var magDir = _nlmdtdXml.replace(/\/[^\/]+$/,'');str = str.replace(/";ss += "";var shuomingTitle = "";var shuomingContent = '';if(fig.titleCn && fig.titleCn!=''){shuomingTitle = fig.titleCn;if(fig.titleContentCn && fig.titleContentCn!=''){shuomingContent += fig.titleContentCn;}}if(shuomingTitle==''){if(fig.titleEn && fig.titleEn!=''){shuomingTitle = fig.titleEn;}if(fig.titleContentEn && fig.titleContentEn!=''){shuomingContent += fig.titleContentEn;}}else{if(fig.titleEn && fig.titleEn!=''){shuomingContent += ""+fig.titleEn+"

来源:2025年第1期

《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》期刊编辑部

查看暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)杂志2025年第1期

联系我们

  • 地址:广东省广州市黄埔大道西601号
  • 电话:020-85224092

咨询工作人员