暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)

作者：刘文勇

单位：四川大学文学与新闻学院。

关键词：民国学界,中国古典文论研究,工诃今人,文学批评

基金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“民国时期的中国古典文论研究”(21BZW023)。

民国学界富于批评精神,这一点在民国时期的中国古典文论研究界也表现明显。他们既工诃古人,更工诃今人。他们批评“喜谤前辈”的“今之少年”,批评以西方文艺之眼光与见解检讨国学,批评“衡文及乎异域”的时代现象,批评今之称赞《文心雕龙》的人为庸人,批评今人不能深知韩愈的真精神,批评反传统的“覆古派”。总之,他们既在整体上对现代以来中国古典文论的研究进行批评,又对王国维、章太炎、范文澜、陈钟凡、郭绍虞、罗根泽、陈延杰等具体的古典文论研究者和他们的著作进行批评。无论其批评是对是错,与此前批评界大多温柔敦厚的态度相比,都批评得一针见血,坦率认真。"/>template{display:none;}.mag-rich-xref-fn { cursor: pointer;}//长视频$(document).ready(function(){if($("#showLongArticleVideo") && $("#showLongArticleVideo").length && $("#showLongArticleVideo").length>0){mag_ajax_update({ele_id:'showLongArticleVideo',url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + "/CN/article/showLongArticleVideo.do?id="+$("#articleId").val()});}});$(document).ready(function(){window.metaData = {"journal":{"issn":"1000-5072","qiKanMingCheng_CN":"暨南学报（哲学社会科学版）","id":2,"qiKanMingCheng_EN":"Jinan Journal"},"fundList_cn":["国家社会科学基金一般项目“民国时期的中国古典文论研究”(21BZW023)。"],"article":{"keywordList_cn":["民国学界","中国古典文论研究","工诃今人","文学批评"],"juan":"47","zhaiyao_cn":"民国学界富于批评精神,这一点在民国时期的中国古典文论研究界也表现明显。他们既工诃古人,更工诃今人。他们批评“喜谤前辈”的“今之少年”,批评以西方文艺之眼光与见解检讨国学,批评“衡文及乎异域”的时代现象,批评今之称赞《文心雕龙》的人为庸人,批评今人不能深知韩愈的真精神,批评反传统的“覆古派”。总之,他们既在整体上对现代以来中国古典文论的研究进行批评,又对王国维、章太炎、范文澜、陈钟凡、郭绍虞、罗根泽、陈延杰等具体的古典文论研究者和他们的著作进行批评。无论其批评是对是错,与此前批评界大多温柔敦厚的态度相比,都批评得一针见血,坦率认真。","endNoteUrl_en":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/EN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=EndNote&id=7152","reference":"","bibtexUrl_cn":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/CN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=BibTeX&id=7152","abstractUrl_en":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/EN/10.11778/j.jnxb.20231729","qi":"1","id":7152,"nian":2025,"bianHao":"1742196813920-876684743","zuoZheEn_L":"LIU Wenyong","juanUrl_en":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/EN/Y2025","shouCiFaBuRiQi":"2025-03-17","qiShiYe":"14","qiUrl_cn":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/CN/Y2025/V47/I1","lanMu_cn":"文艺理论","pdfSize":"676","zuoZhe_CN":"刘文勇","risUrl_cn":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/CN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=Ris&id=7152","title_cn":"民国时期中国古典文论研究界“工诃今人”现象观察","doi":"10.11778/j.jnxb.20231729","jieShuYe":"24","keywordList_en":["academic circles in the Republic of China","study of classical Chinese literary theory","sharp criticism of contemporary people","literary criticism"],"endNoteUrl_cn":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/CN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=EndNote&id=7152","zhaiyao_en":"The so-called Chinese classical literary theory is also known as the history of Chinese literary criticism. Regarding the history of criticism, Mr. Qian Zhongshu once said in his article Chinese Poetry and Chinese Painting that “the study of the history of criticism is ultimately for criticism”. Based on this reasoning, the research on the study of the history of criticism is ultimately for criticism. From this, we can see two types of criticism: One is the criticism of ancient Chinese poetry and prose by scholars of the Republic of China, and the other is the criticism of the study of critical history by scholars of the Republic of China at that time. However, since the 1980s, the focus of academic research on the study of Chinese classical literary theory during the Republic of China period has mostly remained on the discussion of professional issues in classical literary theory, with little attention paid to the sharp criticism and evaluation of ancient Chinese poetry and prose by scholars of the Republic of China when studying classical literary theory. Obviously, this is a research flaw that should be addressed in today's research. The former will be dealt with separately, while the latter is the focus of this article.The academic community of the Republic of China was full of critical spirit, which was evident in the research community of classical Chinese literary theory during the Republic of China period. They are good at criticizing the ancients and better at criticizing the people of the time. They criticized the young people who liked to criticize their predecessors, criticized the phenomenon of explaining Chinese literature and art from the perspective and insights of Western literature and art, criticized the people who praised The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons at the time as mediocre people, criticized the people at that time for not being able to fully understand Han Yu's true spirit, and criticized anti-traditional scholars. In short, they not only criticize the research on modern Chinese classical literary theory as a whole but also criticize specific researchers on classical literary theory and their works such as Wang Guowei, Zhang Taiyan, Fan Wenlan, Chen Zhongfan, Guo Shaoyu, Luo Genze, and Chen Yanjie. Regardless of whether their criticism is right or wrong, they are all straightforward and serious in their criticism.This article mainly adopts the method of empirical literature to complete the research on this topic, with brief comments. In terms of empirical literature, it not only provides a macro perspective of the overall situation of the critical spirit in the research community of classical Chinese literature during the Republic of China period but also displays the details of the critical spirit at a micro level, objectively restoring the historical truth of its critical spirit. Therefore, this article presents the actual situation of their critical spirit through a large number of critical comments by scholars during the Republic of China period on various works and articles studying classical Chinese literature at that time, and also presents the overall spiritual state of scholars of an era. The brief comments in the article generally adhere to the principle of value neutrality, not based on personal preferences, and strive to conclude objectively and rationally.This article presents the critical landscape or scenery of the Republic of China era to today's academic community, providing references for academic criticism today, or helping to change the current research and commentary atmosphere.","bibtexUrl_en":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/EN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=BibTeX&id=7152","abstractUrl_cn":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/CN/10.11778/j.jnxb.20231729","zuoZheCn_L":"刘文勇","juanUrl_cn":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/CN/Y2025","lanMu_en":"","qiUrl_en":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/EN/Y2025/V47/I1","zuoZhe_EN":"LIU Wenyong","risUrl_en":"https://jnxb.jnu.edu.cn/skb/EN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=Ris&id=7152","title_en":"Observation on the Phenomenon of Sharp Criticism of Contemporary People in the Study of Classical Chinese Literary Theory during the Republic of China","hasPdf":"true"},"authorNotes_cn":["刘文勇,四川大学文学与新闻学院。"]};if(window.metaData && (!window.metaData.authorNotesCommon_cn && !window.metaData.authorNotesCorresp_cn && window.metaData.authorNotes_cn)){window.metaData.authorNotesCommon_cn = window.metaData.authorNotes_cn;}if(window.metaData && (!window.metaData.authorNotesCommon_en && !window.metaData.authorNotesCorresp_en && window.metaData.authorNotes_en)){window.metaData.authorNotesCommon_en = window.metaData.authorNotes_en;}var _nlmdtdXml = $("#article_nlmdtdXml").val();var magDir = _nlmdtdXml.replace(/\/[^\/]+$/,'');window.metaData.magDir = magDir;new mag_vue({ el: '#metaVue', //dataUrl: mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/EN/article/getRichHtmlJson.do?articleId='+$("#articleId").val(), data:window.metaData, loading:true, doTextFun:function(text){ return doDataJsonText(text); }, doAfterFun:function(selector,jsonData){doMagVueAfter(selector,jsonData);}});var pars = {attachType:'PDF',id:$("#articleId").val(),json:true};jQuery.post($("#mag-common-contextPath").val()+"/CN/article/showArticleFile.do?" + new Date().getTime(), pars, function(data){var json=null;if(data.match(/^\[json\].*/g)){json=eval("("+data.replace(/^\[json\]/g,"")+")");}if(json && json.status == 1){//有权限}else{//无权限$("#no-access-div").show();}});mag_ajax({url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/article/getRichHtmlJson.do',data:{articleId:$("#articleId").val(),token:'fd347e703b544c139f5fecf8a147c9ba',referer:document.referrer},dataType:"json",async:"false",success:function(json){if(json.richHtmlJson && json.richHtmlJson.article){if(json.trans){var _nlmdtdXmlCN = $("#article_nlmdtdXmlCN").val();var magDirCN = _nlmdtdXmlCN.replace(/\/[^\/]+$/,'');json.richHtmlJson.magDir=magDirCN;}else{json.richHtmlJson.magDir=magDir;}new mag_vue({ el: '#bodyVue', data:json.richHtmlJson, doTextFun:function(text){ return doDataJsonText(text); }, doAfterFun:function(selector,jsonData){doMagVueAfter(selector,jsonData);}});}}});//altmetricif($.trim($("#article_doi").val())!=''){$.ajax({url:'https://api.altmetric.com/v1/doi/'+$.trim($("#article_doi").val())+'?callback=altmetric_callback',//url:'https://api.altmetric.com/v1/doi/10.1007/s13238-016-0264-7?callback=altmetric_callback',dataType:'jsonp'});}mag_rich_menu(jQuery);$(function(){ $('#autoMenu').autoMenu();})$("#autoMenu").niceScroll({cursorcolor: "#ccc", //滚动条的颜色cursoropacitymax: 0, //滚动条的透明度，从0-1 touchbehavior: false, //使光标拖动滚动像在台式电脑触摸设备 true滚动条拖动不可用 cursorwidth: "6px", //滚动条的宽度 单位默认px cursorborder: "0", // 游标边框css定义 cursorborderradius: "3px", //滚动条两头的圆角 autohidemode: true, //是否隐藏滚动条 true的时候默认不显示滚动条，当鼠标经过的时候显示滚动条 zindex: "auto", //给滚动条设置z-index值 railvalign:'defaul',railpadding: {top: 0,right: -6,left: 0,bottom: 0}, //滚动条的位置});window.autoMenuFlag=true;$("#relatedArticles").niceScroll({cursorcolor: "#ccc", //滚动条的颜色cursoropacitymax: 0, //滚动条的透明度，从0-1 touchbehavior: false, //使光标拖动滚动像在台式电脑触摸设备 true滚动条拖动不可用 cursorwidth: "6px", //滚动条的宽度 单位默认px cursorborder: "0", // 游标边框css定义 cursorborderradius: "3px", //滚动条两头的圆角 autohidemode: true, //是否隐藏滚动条 true的时候默认不显示滚动条，当鼠标经过的时候显示滚动条 zindex: "auto", //给滚动条设置z-index值 railvalign:'defaul',railpadding: {top: 0,right: -6,left: 0,bottom: 0}, //滚动条的位置});//公式序号 居右jQuery(".mag-xml-disp-formula").each(function() {var _this = jQuery(this);var _label= _this.children("label");if(typeof(_label.html())!="undefined"){_this.children("label").remove();_this.wrap("");_this.parent().parent().append(""+_label.html()+"");}});$('body').click(function(){$('.daochu_div').hide();$('.qipao').hide();})$('.qipao').click(function(event){event.stopPropagation();})/*参考文献显示隐藏*/$('.biaotijiantoush1').click(function(event){if($(this).attr('class')=='glyphicon glyphicon-triangle-top biaotijiantoush biaotijiantoush1'){$(this).parents('.mag_main_zhengwen_left_div_ckwx_table_benwenyiny').next('.mag_main_zhengwen_left_div_ckwx_table_ckwx_xiangqing').stop().slideUp();$(this).attr('class','glyphicon glyphicon-triangle-bottom biaotijiantoush biaotijiantoush1');}else if($(this).attr('class')=='glyphicon glyphicon-triangle-bottom biaotijiantoush biaotijiantoush1'){$(this).parents('.mag_main_zhengwen_left_div_ckwx_table_benwenyiny').next('.mag_main_zhengwen_left_div_ckwx_table_ckwx_xiangqing').stop().slideDown();$(this).attr('class','glyphicon glyphicon-triangle-top biaotijiantoush biaotijiantoush1');}event.stopPropagation();});//加载补充材料mag_ajax_update({ele_id:'showArticle_suppls',url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/article/showArticleSuppls.do',data:{articleId:$("#articleId").val()}});//加载专题mag_ajax_update({ele_id:'showArticle_subjects',url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/subject/showSubjectListByArticle.do',data:{articleId:$("#articleId").val(),forwardJsp:'showArticle'}});//渲染公式mag_mathJax();});function altmetric_callback(json){if(json && json.score){if(json.score - parseInt(json.score) > 0){$("#altmetric-score").html(parseInt(json.score)+1);}else{$("#altmetric-score").html(parseInt(json.score));}$(".main_content_center_right_duoweidu_div").css("width","25%");$("#altmetric-a").show();$("#altmetric-a").attr("href",json.details_url);}}function richClickAuthor(name){var searchSQL = "((("+mag_advSearchValReplace(name)+"[Author]) AND 2J[Journal]) AND year[Order])";mag_request({url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/searchresult',data:{searchSQL:searchSQL}});}function richClickKeyword(keyword){var searchSQL = "((("+mag_advSearchValReplace(keyword)+"[Keyword]) AND 2J[Journal]) AND year[Order])";mag_request({url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/searchresult',data:{searchSQL:searchSQL}});}function mag_share(){$("#bShare_more_a").click();}function loadRelatedArticles(){if($("#showRelatedArticles") && $("#showRelatedArticles").length>0){//加载过了}else{mag_loading();mag_ajax_update({ele_id:'relatedArticles-content',url:mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/article/relatedArticle.do',data:{id:$("#articleId").val(), forwardJsp:'showArticle'},complete:function(){mag_layer_close();}});}}function showMetrics(){mag_window_location(mag_currentQikanUrl() + '/CN/metrics/'+$("#articleId").val());}function piaofuFn(a,fnId){var content=''+$("#mag-rich-fn-"+fnId).html()+'';piaofu(a,content);}function huoqukuanduimg(){//}function doDataJsonText(text){var str = text;//var _nlmdtdXml = $("#article_nlmdtdXml").val();//var magDir = _nlmdtdXml.replace(/\/[^\/]+$/,'');str = str.replace(/";ss += "";var shuomingTitle = "";var shuomingContent = '';if(fig.titleCn && fig.titleCn!=''){shuomingTitle = fig.titleCn;if(fig.titleContentCn && fig.titleContentCn!=''){shuomingContent += fig.titleContentCn;}}if(shuomingTitle==''){if(fig.titleEn && fig.titleEn!=''){shuomingTitle = fig.titleEn;}if(fig.titleContentEn && fig.titleContentEn!=''){shuomingContent += fig.titleContentEn;}}else{if(fig.titleEn && fig.titleEn!=''){shuomingContent += ""+fig.titleEn+"

来源：2025年第1期

《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》期刊编辑部

查看暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)杂志2025年第1期